Libya’s tragedy 9/11/12 and United States tragedy 9/11/01 in context!

LIBYA: Is Obama viewed by some as a careless human being or is there something more sinister?

 

Former President George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and others sat on vital information for months prior to the devastating terrorist act on September 11, 2001, including the NIE [National Intelligence Estimate] on August 6^th 2001 that explicitly read;

 

“Al Qaeda determined to strike within the United States using Air Crafts as Lethal Weapons.” That statement was at the top of the President’s daily briefing.

 

Please note that this is no hyperbole. This NIE document became public in 2004 after the media including The Associated Press sued under the Freedom of Information Act and the Court ruled it was in the interest of the American People to have this information. (Mr. Bush had refused to release the information voluntarily when National Security Advisor to George W. Bush and other Officials he and his administration were asked about it.) One day after that horrible tragedy Condoleezza Rice in a News Briefing was asked if she as the including President Bush, had any information about terrorist using Aircrafts as Weapons. Ms. Rice flatly denied that they had any such information.

 

Now, that was a terrible tragedy and America and the world came together as a society against these terrorists. In this Libya situation we can all agree that this is a Tragedy that our Ambassador and three other amazing Americans died on the September 11, 2012. However, why in this latest tragedy you hear the voices of the extreme right making all of these unpatriotic statements solely for political benefits? Is it because to some President Obama is a lesser human being than former President George W. Bush, or is there something more sinister?

 

I give credit to former President George W. Bush as one of the Republicans who didn’t try to blame President Obama in this Libyan matter. I am sure as a former President; he knows that despite the title, “we are all fallible human beings.”

 

On the other hand, Mr. Bermuda; Mr. Cayman Island; Mr. Flip Flopper; Mr. Outright Liar; well, he is going to milk this for all he thinks he can get out it; Mitt Romney, a man without any shame; conscience, a man whose religion is Mormonism but whose God is MONEY!

What America needs! Hide your money in Bermuda, Caymans, and Switzerland; hide your Tax Returns from the America people:

Mitt Romney is just what America needs! Hide your money in Bermuda, Caymans and Switzerland; invest in China’s Oil Industry; hide you Tax Returns from the American people; change your positions as often as it takes in order to win; speak disparagingly about your fellow Americans as “free-loaders; deny what you have said if it is working against you [lie]; and don’t forget, form 137 entities in Bermuda to avoid paying Taxes in America and yes, blame the other guy for everything that ails America!

 

Polls prove that the first presidential debate upended the race.

Immediately after the debate, coverage focused on polls that moved in Romney’s direction. After all, a Gallup survey showed that 72 percent of debate watcherssaid Romney did a better job, the most lopsided debate readout Gallup has ever recorded.

But there is little evidence that the debate decisively moved the needle in key swing states. In six state surveys released Thursday by two well-regarded polling partnerships — NBC-Wall Street Journal-Marist and CBS-New York Times-Quinnipiac — there were virtually no shifts for either candidate compared with pre-debate polls.

Nationally, the debate effect may have quickly faded. In Washington Post-ABC News polling after last week’s face-off, voters had more positive reactions to Romney on the first two nights after the debate than on the next two. In Gallup tracking, the post-debate tally is nearly identical to what it was in the preceding days. And one new Florida poll shows momentum for Romney but another doesn’t.

The presidential race has long been characterized as tightly competitive and voters as overwhelmingly locked-in. The first debate seems to have done little to alter these basic, well-documented story lines.

The best polls are those that correctly predict an election’s outcome.

Getting elections “right” is a necessary but insufficient reason to put great stock in polls. Some surveys could be well-modeled — adjusted to previous elections or to hunches, including, some surmise, tweaks to agree with other polls. (Few pollsters relish being an outlier.)

Both the Republican-leaning Rasmussen Reports and the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling have track records that some view favorably, but both use automated phone calls with recorded voices to collect data (“Press 1 for Obama, 2 for Romney,” etc.), revealing a basic flaw: It’s against federal law to have computers dial cellphones, so most “robopolls” ignore about 30 percent of U.S. adults.

At a minimum, excluding cellphones means these polls are increasingly reliant on statistical weighting. They might make up for a lack of young people, for instance, by counting several times the answers from the few younger respondents. Peter Miller, a recent president of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, points out the root problem with weighting: “The more you rely on weights, the more you risk being wrong for reasons you don’t understand.”

It is always better to look at polls’ methodology, not just their results. What’s more, the “horse race” findings are often among the least important parts of a good poll. What issues motivate voters? And who is motivated to vote? These are more crucial to understanding an election than whether a candidate is up two, three or six percentage points.

Polls are skewed if they don’t interview equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans.

Political junkies quickly scan each poll release to see the “party ID split” — the proportions of self-identified Democrats, Republicans and independents in the sample. It makes sense: With party loyalty as strong as it is, the numbers of Democratic and Republican respondents in a survey make a huge difference. But to think, as many do, that there should be equal numbers from each party is off-base, particularly when looking at polls meant to assess the general population’s views.

Though voters seem split down the middle, there have generally been more Democrats than Republicans in the country since pollsters started tracking partisan allegiances after World War II. There is often more parity in election tallies, as Republicans tend to be more reliable voters than Democrats, but that also depends on the year.

Artificially evening out a poll’s partisan balance or arbitrarily setting it to match someone’s guess at turnout on Election Day may make one side a bit happier — but at the expense of distorting the current state of play.

News outlets are biased in presenting polls favorable toward President Obama.

Media-bashing is at a peak among conservatives, and some on the right routinely dismiss any poll showing Obama ahead of Romney. (And some on the left reflexively scorn polls in which Romney leads.) Before recent surveys turned in Romney’s direction, one conservative blogger went so far as to set up UnskewedPolls.com, a site offering “adjusted” public polls, tilted to favor Romney by manipulating the samples to be more Republican.

In truth, news organizations have only one bias — toward news.

Nothing demonstrates this better than the recent coverage of the Pew Research Center’s post debate-national poll, which showed big, across-the-board movements from Obama toward Romney. The Washington Post splashed the poll on its front page, and the survey provided days of fodder for cable news, illustrating that the media gravitate toward a competitive race, big shifts and conflict much more than one political party or the other.

 Article by: John Cohen – Washington post

 

 

Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Karl Rove, The Koch Brothers; do you think that they are on your side?

FACT NOT HYPERBOLE

 

 

If our memory is so short to forget the suffering former President George W. Bush and his party left us in, literally hanging over the Financial Cliff and can’t see that there isn’t one penny worth of difference between Mitt Romney and George W. Bush, then vote for Romney and watch him actually throw America off the cliff.

 

Fact, not hyperbole; Mitt Romney formed 137 (Shell) Companies in the Caymans for the sole purpose of avoiding taxes in order to enrich his own pocket. If Mr. Romney wanted to just chase money then there wouldn’t be a problem at all, but he wants to be President of the United States, a man who has bank accounts in Bermuda, Switzerland, made a major investment in China’s Oil Industry and who wouldn’t release more than two years of tax returns; a man who have been telling the American people I would give everyone a 20% tax reduction across the board that totals five trillion dollars; add two trillion dollars to the defense budget and keep Bush’s tax cut of one trillion dollars and that he would still balance the budget, how stupid are the people to believe such phantasmagoric rationales and internecine policies?

 

 

The uninformed Voters

 

 

Just imagine how shallow we have become in America! Obama had a lack-luster debate; Romney on the other hand lied and disavowed everything he stood for and the majority of Americans gave Romney the victory in the debate!

 

I wonder if America sees how unequivocally stupid we are viewed, especially when we continually try to tell the rest of the world about Democracy, Honesty, and in addition, criticize other world Leaders for duplicity!

 

What an exceptional example we are providing to our children – Lying is a virtue; believing in nothing and chasing money will help build their character. When you grow up hide your money in Bermuda, The Caymans and Switzerland, Invest in China, Vote to give more to the wealthy and your country would be better from the trickled down economics. O yes! We are doing a fine job. We ought to be sincerely ASHAMED!

 

The reason why the Polls are so extreme is not because of the Pollsters, but solely because the American people, not all but many, have no in-depth knowledge of how just how corrupt Politicians are, especially the Republicans.

 

Do you want this man, Mitt Romney to be your President?

Founder of Bain Capital, Mitt Romney though Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Bain/Romney and its credit affiliates, Sankaty Advisors, have set up at least One Hundred and Thirty Seven [137] entities in the Caymans, using local Attorneys and others who provide an Island address for paperwork purposes.

 

Interviews and reviews of thousands of pages of financial documents with Tax Experts found that Mr. Romney may have reduced his personal tax bills, due to the Off-Shore arrangements they implemented. Bain tax-avoidance strategies have enhanced Mr. Romney’s income. In addition, some Off-Shore Entities enabled Bain-Owned Companies to sidestep certain taxes thus increasing returns for Mr. Romney.

 

A low estimate of Mitt Romney’s wealth is $250,000,000.00 remain hidden, because Mr. Romney has released only the last two years of his tax returns. Though Mr. Romney left Bain Capital, for the fifteen years he ran Bain, Romney has continued to share in the Profits of Bain due to the terms of his retirement agreement.

 

There isn’t anything wrong with being Rich if your only interest is Business Profiteering, however, there is plenty wrong when you want to be President of the United States and refuse to disclose to the American People, sufficient information in order for them to make an informed decision as it pertains to voting for you.

 

No previous President of the United States have been so secretive about financial matters and in addition; having accounts in Bermuda; 137 Companies in the Caymans for the sole purpose of avoiding taxes; Swiss Bank Account and investing in China’s Oil Industry, rather than in The United States of America!

 

Financial Policies implemented by a Rich man who sees Corporations as People and his single highest objective is, to increase his wealth and that of his Rich friends, advocating trickled down economics, that have been detrimental to the Middle-Class; Our Children; Veterans; The Elderly and the Poor.

 

Do you really think Mitt Romney’s aspiration to be President is some patriotic conviction to assist America’s 98%, or, is it for self-indulgence to extrapolate from you what little you may have left, from George W. Bush’s Policies that decimated you and your family?

 

Hence, I repeat my question: “Do you want this man, Mitt Romney, to be your President?

Bush took us into the deepest Recession; Obama kept us from falling into a Depression!

Beyond the shifting job numbers, what matters is how, with right fiscal-monetary policy mix, and astute management, Obama has held on firmly against all the odds in preventing the US economy from falling into a Depression.

 

As for the clearing of the mess that he had inherited from the preceding Republican administration, let alone Obama, no other President in his place could have done much to fix the economy than perhaps he did, despite constant hurdles presented by the Republican opposition.

 

Again, as far as the employment situation is concerned, it’s not the government driven effort only that matters, rather equally important is private sector push, that was deliberately withheld, leaving Obama alone to do whatever he could to at least not allow further deterioration of our Economy and Employment!

 

There is rough justice in the way things are playing out. Having spent the last year wrongly blaming the president for high unemployment, Republicans can only stand by helplessly as the unemployment rate goes down at the worst possible moment for them. Fox News scoured the data Friday, looking for signs that the economy wasn’t improving. They found some: high unemployment for African-Americans, for instance, and fewer manufacturing jobs.

Mitt Romney, Mr. Shyster, was LYING his ASS OFF during the first Presidential Debate…

What the Wednesday night Presidential Debate proved is that Mr. Shyster, Mitt Romney was LYING his ASS OFF without conscience or shame and somehow believes that the American people are just dumb and stupid!

Mitt Romney insisted that he doesn’t have a $5 trillion tax cut in his plan, and that he won’t reduce the taxes paid by the wealthiest Americans. On the stump, Romney has pushed to lower everyone’s tax rates by 20%, an amount independent groups say will reduce federal revenue by $5 trillion over the next decade.

Obama charged that for the past year-and-half, his opponent has been running on such a tax plan and now his“big, bold idea is ‘never mind.'” 

CNN took an instant Poll which in itself is very dumb and declared Romney the winner. It would be amazing to see that within the next several days when Mitt Romney is still behind in the Swing States, you would see these same Pundits climbing all over Romney’s ass.

The News Media would never call the Presidential Election in November “as a lost cause” for Romney which perhaps are their duty, but in truth an in fact, Mitt Romney would never win the Presidency and for one sole reason; “The Majority of The American people do not trust Romney.” They are fully cognizant that for the past two decades, Romney has changed his position on almost every Policy and that, “it would be financial suicide to accept Mitt Romney’s word on any promises he makes.”